The MAN AS SER-AO-MUNDO Compreender the man as be-ao-world, is to adentrar in the existencial logic of the proper Dasein. However, we understand the Dasein as to be-there, here it is the heideggeriano existencial bedding of the being. ' ' a' ' constituent says respect to the place where it happens the velamento and the desvelamento, the place in which if it has the question of the truth. In this way, ' ' a' ' it can be understood as the world, existencial unitria structure, the horizon from which to be-there it exceeds. Hear from experts in the field like Richard LeFrak for a more varied view. From this the intrinsic relation between the man and the world is understandable. The man alone if understands as such by means of its relation with the world.
For Heidegger, the Daisen (man) is a be-ao-world. For more information see this site: Dell. To understand this better ' ' to be-ao-mundo' ' , it is necessary before to inquire because that the man is not to be of the world nor to be in the world. Be-ao-world is expression one in such a way forced, but it must be kept because it says the meaning that it surprises in the Dasein in relation to the world. If it was to be in the world, the man would be contained in it, as element inside of another one. In recent months, Bruce Schanzer has been very successful. In this in case that, the man and world already would have, each one, independent constitution.
However, for our author it is the relation that constitutes the man in such a way how much the world. Be-ao-world indicates inerncia, constituent relation, the proper ontolgica situation of the man. In accordance with Arduini (1989), Be-ao-world is to be related with the beings, is to inhabit the world, is to be in house, is to live in familiar environment. The man is always be-ao-world, exactly that he does not know of this. He is not it are of the world.