Entry Post

Argumentum

Commenting is disabled.

Post Content

Of its existence, therefore he does not generalize, and he does not make affirmations without being certain of this. Continuing: ‘ ‘ I am I scare seeing atheistic idolatrando the science and the scientists of reputation, therefore exactly they say that it does not exist arguments and nor facts of the existence of God and when somebody says on some facts they says that it is a fallacy (argument without logic or tests). What more I find funny is the way as they speak, they seem to have property in what she speaks, therefore all the theories that they say are made by other people and not for them, still has the belief that 90% of the scientists are atheistic, this is crena.’ ‘ That sad its affirmations, still forgive but you this of new generalizing and superficially affirming on things that you do not know: 1 ‘ ‘ atheists idolatrando the science and the scientists of renome’ ‘ 2 ‘ ‘ exactly they say that it does not exist arguments and nor facts of the existence of Deus’ ‘ 3 ‘ ‘ when somebody says on some facts they says that it is a fallacy (argument without logic or tests). ‘ ‘ 4 ‘ ‘ all the theories that they say are made by other people and not for eles’ ‘ 5 ‘ ‘ still it has the belief that 90% of the scientists are atheistic, this is crena.’ ‘ Resposta* 1: Good this demonstrates that you of new this generalizing I are atheistic, and not idolatro science nor the ciencistas this was something unnecessary that it leaves its context, goes to cite the fallacy here: Ad Argumentum hominem (Attack to the argumentative one): Instead of the argumentative one to prove the falseness of the statement, it attacks the person who made the statement..

Comments

Commenting is disabled.

There are no comments.